You should use ConcurrentHashMap when you need very high concurrency in your project. It is thread safe without synchronizing the whole map . Reads can happen very fast while write is done with a lock. There is no locking at the object level.
Why ConcurrentHashMap should be used over HashMap?
Advantages of ConcurrentHashMap over HashMap
It provides No object-level Locking. It uses a multitude of locks. It allows other threads to iterate the objects when one thread is iterating. It is thread-safe, especially in the case of multi-threading.
Why is ConcurrentHashMap thread-safe?
It is thread-safe because concurrent access to the map will not corrupt the internal data structure, or cause any update lost unexpected, etc. Not only is retrieval non-blocking, even updates can happen concurrently. However, non-blocking/concurrent-updates does not means that it is thread-UNsafe.
How does a ConcurrentHashMap work in Java?
ConcurrentHashMap class is thread-safe i.e. multiple threads can operate on a single object without any complications. At a time any number of threads are applicable for a read operation without locking the ConcurrentHashMap object which is not there in HashMap.
Why ConcurrentHashMap provides better performance than synchronizedMap?
ConcurrentHashMap allows performing concurrent read and write operation. Hence, performance is relatively better than the Synchronized Map. In Synchronized HashMap, multiple threads can not access the map concurrently. Hence, the performance is relatively less than the ConcurrentHashMap.
Why is ConcurrentHashMap faster?
If you want to operate on your data as fast as possible, use all the threads available. That seems obvious, each thread has 1/nth of the full work to do. If you choose a single thread access use HashMap , it is simply faster. For add method it is even as much as 3x more efficient.
Why ConcurrentHashMap is faster than HashTable in Java?
Answer: ConcurrentHashMap is introduced in Java 1.5. ConcurrentHashMap uses multiple buckets to store data. This avoids read locks and greatly improves performance over a HashTable.
Can ConcurrentHashMap have null key?
The JavaDoc of ConcurrentHashMap says this: Like Hashtable but unlike HashMap , this class does not allow null to be used as a key or value.
Do I need to synchronize ConcurrentHashMap?
The ConcurrentHashMap is very similar to the HashMap class, except that ConcurrentHashMap offers internally maintained concurrency. It means you do not need to have synchronized blocks when accessing ConcurrentHashMap in multithreaded application.
Does ConcurrentHashMap maintain insertion order?
ConcurrentHashMap and HashTable do not preserve the insertion order of mappings in the map. Also, the addition and removal of any element might change its iteration order. … SynchronizedMap() is backed by the specified map and retains the insertion order of the map.
What is difference between synchronizedMap and ConcurrentHashMap?
synchronizedMap() requires each thread to acquire a lock on the entire object for both read/write operations. By comparison, the ConcurrentHashMap allows threads to acquire locks on separate segments of the collection, and make modifications at the same time.
Does ConcurrentHashMap uses object level lock?
ConcurrentHashMap was introduced in JDK 5. There is no locking at the object level,The locking is at a much finer granularity.
How does ConcurrentHashMap achieve scalability?
Unlike Hashtable which achieves its thread-safety by compromising the scalability, ConcurrentHashMap uses advanced techniques e.g. dividing the map into segments to remain thread-safe and scalable at the same time.
What is the difference between synchronized and concurrent collection in Java?
Answer. The main reason for this slowness is locking; synchronized collections lock the whole collection e.g. whole Map or List while concurrent collection never locks the whole Map or List. …
Which statement is true for ConcurrentHashMap and collections synchronizedMap () in Java?
ConcurrentHashMap does not allow null keys or null values while synchronized HashMap allows one null keys. Hashtable and ConcurrentHashMap do not allow null keys or null values. Collections. synchronizedMap(Map) synchronizes all operations ( get , put , size , etc).
Which is better to use synchronized over the map or using ConcurrentHashMap?
Concurrent hashmap allows concurrent read and write. So performance is relatively better than a synchronized map. Multiple threads can’t access the map concurrently. So, performance is relatively less than a concurrent hash map.